Monday, September 1, 2008

Mindless violence in Orissa

Entry for August 27, 2008 Recent outburst of violence in Orissa following the brutal and cowardly killing of an Octogenarian Swamiji demonstrates once again how inhuman humans have become. Conversion to Christianity was the alleged cause of the violence. The deceased Swamiji , was against such conversion and dedicated his life for the cause of Hinduism. Who killed Swamiji? It is still a debatable and contentious issue. It led to wide spread violence across the State and a hapless Hindu girl who was a Volunteer Worker in a Church was burnt to death. Such brutality deserves strong condemnation and our great Hindu leaders are silent. They donot value lives of common and poor people and I also condemn the mindless religious conversion under the guise of upliftment. But, the question we hindus (and so called great Hindu leaders) should ask ourselves is that what forced or are the reasons for such conversions? Our social structure is such that the under provileged or tribals are sledom accepted into the mainstream and mostly branded as unwanted or undesirable. This has been going on for centuries and still it continues, rather covertly. First of all, are any of the tribals aware that there is a religion called Hinduism? or do they know that they are also Hindus? My guess is that they do not know. They have their own customs and practices which the Hindu religious practcises may not accept. The concept of religion, as we understand, would have been unknown to them till they came into contact with the modernity. Unfortunately none of Hindu acharyas ( except perhaps a handful) did ever try to bring them to the mainstream Hinduism, for obvious reasons. This was taken advantage of by the Churches and indulged in mass conversion without due regard to the sentiments of the Society at large. These conversions were a rude wake up call for the Great Hindu Leaders and the selfish politicians took full advantage of the situation to flare up communal feelings in the name of religion and community. In this sordid game of one upmanship, the developement and upliftment of downtrodden was neglected. It is high time the leaders of the nation, including the religious leaders, think beyond petty religious issues and concetrate on nation building. Of course, I do not advocate religious conversions if they are done with the motive of populating their religion and done without taking consent of the people involved nor telling people the merits of their religion(not monetray benefits) over their existing religion.

3 comments:

Unknown said...

I have a pusillanimous view on this issue. I fear to convey my version on this to anybody. Probably this conveys the whole truth a la "my life is my message". When we criticise "Varnashrama" it can not be without pitfalls. Issue is not the religion but untouchability or acts of similar nature. But they were spawned by the same religion is a matter of concern. Well, based upon a varnam an individual's profession could have been decided but how it defined the inter group protocol is still a matter of conjecture. I lack comprehensive knowledge on these aspects like Manu Smruti etc, but I for one believe that any interaction should be purely a choice of personal liking nothing more. If Hinduism happens to be a way of life then it cannot be faulted for such bigotry like ostracization of sub groups. My opinion is that the decision taken by those who chose a different religion (school of thought) by leaving (?) Hinduism is as much flawed as that of the concept of inadmissibility of certain groups into temple precincts by caste Hindus. The root could be inter personal animosity between members of two locally divided groups. That had been blown out of proportions. Well those were the days where even the fairer sex had a highly skewed treatment. The same crooked minds highlight those episodes like Krishna meeting Sudama or Rama embracing Kewat, Kannappar planting his foot on Shivlinga. I think the so called Hindus (with whom I identify myself based on the rejection of improbable methodology) have got all of themselves to blame for leaving the Smritis and Upanishads solely at the disposal of the enlightened mountain haunters to churn with.

M.Veeraraghavan said...

In spite of calling ourselves as a civilised lot we still adhere to the rule of the jungle 'survival of the fittest'. Our educaion is producing money earning machines and we have very scant regard for moral education which moulds human nature for peaceful co-existence. It is high time everyone realises this need and does something at micro level to create awareness even among the so-called educated elite.

M. Srinath said...

Views of Jayasankar and Veeraraghavan are well taken. They are very relevant. Lets face it. Who has the time for moral education?, As Veeraraghvan says, education is now producing money making machines with scant regard to values of life. Religious leaders target these "money making machines" and hold conventions to depict a warped view of religion that result in "groupism" and promote intolerance to other points of view.